After prosecutors dropped a high-profile spying case involving two men accused of aiding Chinese intelligence, ministers rushed to defend the government. They stressed the move stemmed from legal limits, not political interference, as pressure mounted over the UK’s handling of China policy and security transparency.

Ministers Reject Interference Claims

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said Powell had no involvement in evidential or legal aspects of the case, countering speculation about political influence. Officials maintain the Crown Prosecution Service halted proceedings only because the government could not legally confirm China was a national-security threat at the time.

Security Chiefs Voice Concern

The decision drew sharp criticism from intelligence veterans. Sir John Sawers said U.S. partners would view the collapse as “confusing.” Lord Mark Sedwill urged ministers to define China as a “direct threat” instead of a “strategic challenge.” Prosecutor Stephen Parkinson revealed the CPS had sought that classification “for months” but never received it.

Political Fallout in Westminster

Starmer blamed the previous Conservative administration for failing to designate China a threat during the relevant period, saying his government was legally constrained. Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch demanded a full statement to explain inconsistencies.

Meanwhile, ministers remain split over approving China’s planned “mega-embassy” at Royal Mint Court, arguing the controversy heightens security risks.