A leaked document from a security briefing revealed that Hezbollah leadership rejected a proposed coordination mechanism with the Lebanese army regarding missile and drone deployments. According to insiders, this proposal was raised following recent Israeli strikes that narrowly avoided triggering full-scale war. Hezbollah reportedly saw the coordination offer as a threat to its autonomy, while the Lebanese military expressed frustration over being sidelined in decisions that could provoke regional escalation.

The dispute has widened the rift between Hezbollah and senior military and intelligence figures, some of whom argue that the party's unilateral military actions risk drawing Lebanon into conflict without national consensus. Hezbollah’s refusal to integrate or even formally coordinate its arsenal has now become a central point of contention in ongoing national security talks.

Internal Discontent And Sectarian Shift

For the first time, public criticism of Hezbollah’s weapons is surfacing from Shiite political and religious figures traditionally aligned with the party. Influential clerics and intellectuals have voiced concerns about the opaque decision-making and the strategic costs of maintaining an independent arsenal outside state control.

These internal shifts have reportedly alarmed Hezbollah’s leadership, who fear losing the narrative monopoly it once held within its core constituency. Analysts close to the group indicate that leaders are now engaged in internal reassessments of how to respond to both Israeli pressure and growing domestic fatigue with prolonged militarization.

The issue of weapons has now reemerged as a defining challenge in Lebanon’s fragile political order, especially as negotiations on national defense strategy and regional diplomacy unfold. Whether Hezbollah concedes to even partial integration or oversight remains uncertain, but the calls for change are louder than ever.