Who Is Trying to Steal the Sudanese Army’s Victory?

Sudanese army advances militarily while international powers push for a ceasefire. The U.S.-led Quad accused of promoting a premature political settlement.

June 24, 2025Clash Report

Cover Image
ClashReport Editor

ClashReport

In a pivotal moment in Sudan’s civil war, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) appear close to gaining the upper hand on the battlefield. Yet, according to Dr. Yasser Mahjoub Hussein’s opinion piece on Al Jazeera, international actors—especially the U.S.-led “Quad” (U.S., UK, Saudi Arabia, and UAE)—are pushing to impose a ceasefire that overlooks the SAF's battlefield advantage and treats the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) as an equal political stakeholder.

The author refers to this approach as a “flawed peace” that attempts to freeze the conflict on outdated terms, ignoring the reality of shifting ground conditions.

Accusations of Rehabilitating the RSF

The article criticizes the Quad for attempting to “repackage” the RSF—accused of ethnic cleansing and mass atrocities—as a legitimate political player. The U.S. is particularly targeted for what the author sees as selective pressure: sanctioning the SAF while downplaying RSF crimes.

This, the author argues, sends the wrong message to the Sudanese public and undermines the state’s sovereignty.

The Danger of an Incomplete Victory

According to Hussein, enforcing a settlement without translating military gains into political authority could lead to:

  • Weakening the army’s credibility and morale.
  • Diluting civilian transition under a compromised framework.
  • Deepening public distrust in the political process.

He warns of repeating regional precedents where externally brokered peace deals empowered war criminals and sidelined state institutions.

A Call for a Nationally Anchored Peace

The author argues that a lasting peace must come from within Sudan—not from foreign capitals. This vision includes:

  • Complete disarmament of militias.
  • Selective integration of vetted individuals into the army.
  • Accountability for coup leaders and war criminals.
  • A path to restoring public trust and national sovereignty.

Conclusion:
Hussein warns that a rushed and externally imposed settlement risks converting battlefield victory into political paralysis. He urges Sudanese stakeholders to insist on a peace process that reflects the sacrifices made on the ground and reclaims full state authority.

Related Topics

Sudan
Sudanese Army
RSF
Rapid Support Forces
U.S. Quad
Flawed Peace
Ceasefire Sudan
SAF Victory
Sudan Conflict
Militia Disarmament
Transitional Justice
Political Pressure Sudan
Yasser Mahjoub Hussein
Al Jazeera Opinion
International Interference
Sudan War 2025