Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Kasra stated that “all units operating in Suwayda are to immediately halt fire” as part of a mutual understanding reached with the city’s notables. He stressed that the Syrian army will only respond to sources of direct attack or threats posed by “outlawed groups.” His remarks followed days of violence that left at least 99 people dead, including dozens of fighters and civilians.

The truce reflects a shift in the government’s approach to post-conflict stabilization. Rather than enforcing full military control, authorities opted for coordinated withdrawal and transition of power to civil security structures — a model being cautiously watched in other parts of Syria.

Security Transferred To Interior Ministry

As part of the ceasefire implementation, the Syrian Interior Ministry confirmed it would assume security responsibilities across Suwayda’s neighborhoods. The ministry issued a stern warning that any assaults on public or private property “will be met with firm legal consequences,” regardless of the perpetrators’ affiliation.

While army combat units are pulling back, military police will remain stationed to oversee compliance with the agreement and protect civilians. This dual presence is intended to provide reassurance during the transition phase.

According to Al Jazeera and local sources, the withdrawal began early Tuesday and proceeded without clashes. Residents expressed cautious relief, though tensions remain high amid fears of renewed tribal or militia violence.

A Test For Syria’s New Political Order

The Suwayda ceasefire marks the first major negotiated withdrawal of Syrian troops since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s government in December 2024 and the appointment of interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa. Unlike previous confrontations, this agreement highlights the state’s willingness to work with local religious and tribal authorities to restore order — a shift from past practices rooted in military dominance.

Observers note that the government’s handling of Suwayda may serve as a precedent for other restive regions, particularly those where community militias continue to resist centralized rule. The outcome may influence the broader strategy for rebuilding national unity in Syria’s post-Assad era.