June 24, 2025Clash Report
In a pivotal moment in Sudan’s civil war, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) appear close to gaining the upper hand on the battlefield. Yet, according to Dr. Yasser Mahjoub Hussein’s opinion piece on Al Jazeera, international actors—especially the U.S.-led “Quad” (U.S., UK, Saudi Arabia, and UAE)—are pushing to impose a ceasefire that overlooks the SAF's battlefield advantage and treats the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) as an equal political stakeholder.
The author refers to this approach as a “flawed peace” that attempts to freeze the conflict on outdated terms, ignoring the reality of shifting ground conditions.
The article criticizes the Quad for attempting to “repackage” the RSF—accused of ethnic cleansing and mass atrocities—as a legitimate political player. The U.S. is particularly targeted for what the author sees as selective pressure: sanctioning the SAF while downplaying RSF crimes.
This, the author argues, sends the wrong message to the Sudanese public and undermines the state’s sovereignty.
According to Hussein, enforcing a settlement without translating military gains into political authority could lead to:
He warns of repeating regional precedents where externally brokered peace deals empowered war criminals and sidelined state institutions.
The author argues that a lasting peace must come from within Sudan—not from foreign capitals. This vision includes:
Conclusion:
Hussein warns that a rushed and externally imposed settlement risks converting battlefield victory into political paralysis. He urges Sudanese stakeholders to insist on a peace process that reflects the sacrifices made on the ground and reclaims full state authority.
Africa
August 2025
Africa
August 2025
Africa
September 2025
Middle East
October 2025
Africa
June 2025
Africa
July 2025