Masra’s lawyers denounced the court’s move as “arbitrary” and “legally unsubstantiated,” stating the prosecution lacks material proof or reliable testimony. They called for full respect of due process and appealed to Chad’s international partners and human rights organizations to ensure judicial transparency.

The case has triggered renewed concerns over judicial independence in Chad. Critics argue the government is using the judiciary to suppress political opposition, especially with upcoming electoral deadlines. The indictment has re-ignited debate on the rule of law and democratic reform in a country still transitioning from military to civilian rule.

Masra rejoined the opposition after completing his transitional role as prime minister and has since advocated for democratic reforms. His referral to the criminal court marks a significant escalation in government-opposition tensions. Observers warn that the proceedings could exacerbate the country’s polarized political landscape, already strained by past electoral boycotts and disputes over transitional governance.

The arrest and prosecution of Masra follow his reported detention at home and subsequent accusations by the public prosecutor. His legal case has become a focal point for broader concerns about political repression and the integrity of Chad’s democratic trajectory.