Senate Vote Clears Way for Trump to Use Force in Venezuela
The U.S. Senate narrowly rejected a resolution that aimed to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to take further military action in Venezuela without prior congressional approval.
January 15, 2026Clash Report
In a deeply divided 51-50 vote, the Senate dismissed a bill that sought to curb presidential military authority regarding Venezuela, with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The move comes against the backdrop of recent U.S. actions in Venezuela and intense debate over the constitutional role of Congress in authorizing military operations.
Deadlock in the Senate Over War Powers
The Senate vote to halt the war powers resolution ended in a 50-50 tie, which was broken by Vice President J.D. Vance in favor of the administration’s position, effectively blocking the measure. Only three Republican senators—Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Rand Paul—joined all Democrats in supporting the resolution to advance debate, while key Republicans such as Josh Hawley and Todd Young reversed earlier support after pressure from the White House and assurances from senior administration officials.
Supporters of the resolution argued that without clear congressional authorization, future U.S. military action could unfold without adequate legislative oversight, raising constitutional concerns about unchecked presidential authority. Opponents maintained that there were no active ground forces in Venezuela at present, and procedural tactics were justified.
Recent U.S. Military Action in Venezuela
The legislative debate follows a surprise U.S. military operation on January 3 that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, an action undertaken without prior congressional authorization. The administration later released a heavily redacted legal opinion arguing that the operation did not constitute “war in the constitutional sense” and was justified under domestic law, focusing on law enforcement and limited engagement rather than a broader military campaign.
This military action intensified scrutiny over the president’s foreign policy and prompted bipartisan efforts in Congress to reassert war-powers limits, reflecting broader unease over the executive branch’s autonomy to undertake significant military actions.
Related Topics
Related News
Israel Expands West Bank Mass Raids & Demolitions
15/01/2026
Greenlanders Afraid: Trump’s Ambition Sparks Local Anxiety
15/01/2026
Ugandan Election Chief Says He Was Threatened Over Results
15/01/2026
Germany’s Merz Admits Nuclear Exit Was Strategic Mistake
15/01/2026
Trump Renews Greenland Push After Tense Talks at Whitehouse
15/01/2026
Iran Denies Execution Plans
15/01/2026
